🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to decide which posts appear to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."